Introductory techniques
Take a mindful walk around the grounds as a class and consider what the impacts that a group of younger pupils might have on the environment doing a similar walk through the local park.
For example, noise, footfall erosion, litter, picking flowers, pulling and breaking branches, jamming coins into tree trunks and branches, wandering onto private land, taking up the whole path etc.
What about other users who visit the park. How do their various activities impact the space? Dog poo, vandalism of trees and human features, fly tipping, graffiti, unauthorised BBQs/fires etc.
Technique to assess human impact and ethics
Carry out a human impact survey of the local park:
| Type of evidence | Lots of evidence | Some
evidence |
No
evidence |
| Informal footpaths | |||
| Litter | |||
| Unauthorised BBQs or firepits | |||
| Vandalism to trees, plants etc | |||
| Fly tipping | |||
| Graffiti | |||
| Litter | |||
| Dog waste | |||
| Flower beds/ wildflower area | |||
| Tree planting | |||
| Bug hotels | |||
| Pond | |||
| Bird boxes |
Discuss which of these features have a positive and which a negative impact. For the negative features, discuss which are thoughtless actions and which are deliberate. Then discuss the phrase ‘Take only photos, leave only footprints’. What does this mean to pupils?

Pupils could work in pairs to either design guidelines for visiting a location on a fieldtrip or design guidelines to share with pupils at an assembly on how to be a good tourist.
Back to Human impact and ethics menu

The Geographical Association (GA) has worked closely with the Field Studies Council (FSC) to develop these resources.